Gal 1:8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!
Pasugo vs Pasugo
July 9, 2008Pinalitan naman natin ang nakasulat sa mali-mali nating pahayagan. PASUGO- the God’s message. Pacencya na po bobo kasi ang ating mga editors.
Previous Comments
By reading the whole chapter and paying close attention to Isaiah 41:2,10,13,l5, there’s an image of a fearsome “warrior” whom God called from the east. Iglesia claims this is Felix Manalo from the Philippines. There’s one big problem with the Iglesia interpretation because in
Chapter 45:1-2 it clearly says, “This is what the Lord says to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I take hold of to subdue nations before him and to strip kings of their armor, to open doors before him so that gates will not be shut: I will go before you and will level the mountains…. (emphasis ours)” These verses clearly identify the “warrior” in Chapter 41. It is so specific that the name of this prophesied individual was given–Cyrus. Chapter 45 states it is Cyrus who will subdue kings, whose right hand God will take hold of, and who will “level mountains”– not Felix Manalo as Iglesia deludes its followers into thinking.
Comment: People have the right to know. Read the expose in “iglesia ni Cristo”.
How could you promote this unless what’s at stake is the money that Cranky was boasting around.You must be mentally retarded if you follow this as the authority or is there money in return. Manalo’s name never appeared in the entire bible whatever version you have-he is hallucinating and thinks he is Cyrus.
a pillar of iglesia belief is that its emergence in the philippines was prophesied in the bible. this idea is supposedly found in isaiah 43:5–6, which states, “fear not, for i am with you; i will bring your offspring from the east, and from the west i will gather you; i will say to the north, ‘give up,’ and the south, ‘do not withhold; bring my sons from afar and my daughters from the end of the earth.’”
iglesia argues that in this verse, isaiah is referring to the “far east” and that this is the place where the “church of christ” will emerge in the last days. this point is constantly repeated in iglesia literature: “the prophecy stated that god’s children shall come from the far east” (pasugo, march 1975, 6).
but the phrase “far east” is not in the text. in fact, in the tagalog (filipino) translation, as well as in the original hebrew, the words “far” and “east” are not even found in the same verse, yet the iglesia recklessly combine the two verses to translate “far east.” using this fallacious technique, iglesia claims that the far east refers to the philippines.
iglesia is so determined to convince its followers of this “fact” that it quotes isaiah 43:5 from an inexact paraphrase by protestant bible scholar james moffatt that reads, “from the far east will i bring your offspring.” citing this mistranslation, one iglesia work states, “is it not clear that you can read the words ‘far east’? clear! why does not the tagalog bible show them? that is not our fault, but that of those who translated the tagalog bible from english—the catholics and protestants” (isang pagbubunyag sa iglesia ni cristo, 1964:131). the iglesia accuses everyone else of mistranslating the bible, when it is iglesia that is taking liberties with the original language.
comment: isaiah chapter 41:2, who hath raised up the just one from the east…….etc
show me where the far? east is or have you fabricated?
they end up quoting from spurious works at their convenience. which leads to st john’s warning:
revelation c22: 18~19; can’t add or take away from words of the book or else, you know.
Thats Not true!!!
kc hindi kayo pnagkalooban ng diyos ng kaalaman
dahil ang alam nyu lang ay bumasa ngunit hindi marunong umunawa
tama naman diba?
kulang pa kayo sa kaalaman sa biblia..
Posted by vhinx at March 9, 2009, 5:14 amOisst?? Then read your Bible if the far east refer to the Philippines. Remember the 3 kings that give presents to Jesus. They came from the far east, are they Filipinos?? tsk tsk tsk..
Stay in Jerusalem and point the far east, that is where the 3 kings came from, not the Philippines…very poor understanding..
” nu bang pinaglalaban nyu……ang daming pinaglalaban puro nmn bulaan….ang tanong bobo ba tlga yung mga ngsulat nyan…..tama o tama tlaga ako
Posted by ampon_ni_manalo at September 1, 2009, 5:37 pmWALANG ISIP!ANG GUMAWA NITO…
ISA KAUNG ANTI-CHRIST mga Bulaan na nagpapangap na marurunong..KUNG SINO MAN ANG KUMALABAN SA IGLESIA NA KAY CRISTO AY KaLABAn Ng DIOS..
haysssssss….mga wlng mgwa sa buhay!THE CREATOR OF THIS SITE IS THE BIGGEST LOSER!!!!!
kng baga sbi nga ang bibig ginagamit sa paglilingkod at hnd sa pagkutya!!!!YOU NOOB!!!!!
sa mga d INC dont jst jugde,prove it with ur own eyes and tell words with ur own expirience!!!
sa mga INC nmn e2 lng masa2bi q,sbi ni Kristo ang sino mang kumukutya sa inyo ay aq ang kinukutya.
Loser k tlga!!!!y?kc kailangan pa ng approval mo pra mai display ang comment!meaning pg d pabor xempre wla!!!!but nwiez,PATAWARIN K NG DIYOS!!!!^^sbi kc msma dw ang manira at mangutya ng kapwa cge k mbigat ang karma nyan!!!hehehe….syang tlino mo ginagamit mo lng sa kalokohan at paninira!haysss….ikw ang taong wlng diyos dhl puro kalokohan nsa utak mo kng meron k mng utak!^^NAKA2AWA K K NMN!!!!
Posted by lorie at September 4, 2009, 11:21 pmuh– LORIE?
Kung may mapa ka, yung Philippines, nsa timog silangang bahagi.
)
Masyado ka.
)
Stupid Gay. :>
Then check your 1967 Pasugo and compared it to 1997 edition.Let’s see your cult ministers won’t allow you to lookat them, religious cult!!!
Posted by eraniomanalo at September 19, 2009, 12:20 am“Far East IS the Philippines” (ang malayong silangan AY ang pilipinas) is very different from “Far East includes the Philippines” (saklaw ng malayong silangan ang pilipinas or kasama ang pilipinas sa malayong silangan)…
they are caught red handed…
Posted by lucius_ferrer at September 22, 2009, 5:13 pmyup, that’s right bro..if they do not have the almanac, it’s hard for them to prove it.BTW, today, Philippines is classified as a Southeast Asian country, not a far east country on d old classification….
Posted by eraniomanalo at September 23, 2009, 6:16 pmAll comments are moderated. Your comments will not appear here unless approved by the blog owner. Thank you.



sinagot na po yan . manood po kayo tamang daan sa net25 para malaman ninyo, kung nakakaunawa lang talaga ng bumbasa pasugo na yan wala naman po kontra eh,. di lang po talaga nagiisip yon iba, o bka wala lang talaga isip??
ang ibig sabihin mo ng pasugo hindi namn po lahat ng malayong silangan (mention) o binabangit sa bilia ay tumutukoy lang pilipinas..
we have never taught that any mention of the expression far east refer the phillipINES
TOO NAMAN PO TALAGA ANG FAR EAST AYON SA HISTORY AY KASAMA SA FAR EAST ANG PILINAS,. WALA PO KONTRA DYAN,
WLA LANG TALAGA MAGAWA MO ISIP ANG NAGSSABI KONTRA YAN. DAHIL ANG ISIP NILA MGA BALIKTAD PO! SABI NG BIBLIA MGA BALIKTAD ANG ISIP?
IKAW BALIKTAD BA ISIP MO???
Posted by TAMANG DAAN at August 26, 2008, 12:50 pm